Get notified by email when this case is updated.
The Georgia Gazette is actively monitoring this case. Check back for the latest updates as more information becomes available.
Name:
Prezeau, Mariolina
Date of Booking:
12/31/2025
Reason(s) For Booking:
DISORDERLY CONDUCT
OBSTRUCTION OFFICER – MISD
CRIMINAL TRESPASSING – PHYSICAL TRESPASS
SIMPLE ASSAULT
Officer’s Narrative:
[Please note: The following is a direct transcription from the official initial incident report. The Georgia Gazette does not fix any spelling or grammatical errors that may exist. Any changes or redactions made by our staff are placed inside brackets. Some errors may exist. All subjects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The topics discussed may be sensitive to some readers. Discretion is advised.]
On December 31st, 2025, at approximately 1400, I, Officer Fowler, was dispatched to 111 Brown Industrial Pkwy (Must Ministries) in reference to a trespasser.
I arrived on the scene and made contact with the caller and employee [VICTIM #1]. Who stated she wanted the female in the corner, later identified as Mariolina, criminally trespassed from the property. I informed Mariolina that she was trespassing on the property and she needed to leave. She refused to leave.
I asked her once again and informed her she was going to be arrested if she didn’t leave. She remained seated, crossed her arms, and stated no and asked me to take her to jail. I grabbed her by the arm and began escorting her out. She began yelling things; however, I couldn’t make out what she was saying.
As she was doing this, she raised her right arm with her fist balled as if she was going to hit me. I threw my hand up and blocked her arm, as I was in fear she was going to punch me in the face. She then began pulling away from me, trying to break free from my grip.
I eventually was able to place her in handcuffs; after achieving proper fit, I double-locked them, and attempted to place her in my patrol car. However, she refused to step in. I went around to the other side and assisted her inside the patrol car.
I went inside and spoke with [VICTIM #1] and asked her what had happened prior to us arriving. She stated that they asked Mariolina to leave multiple times; however, she refused. She then threatened to smack [VICTIM #1] multiple times and said she wasn’t going to leave while screaming and cursing at staff members. I asked [VICTIM #1] how she felt when Mariolina stated she was going to smack her; she stated she didn’t care because she deals with it all the time and irritates her.
I spoke with a witness and employee on scene identified as [WITNESS #1]. I asked her what had happened before we arrived, she stated she was in the lobby with [VICTIM #1] and Mariolina when [VICTIM #1] asked Mariolina to leave. She began yelling and cursing and told [VICTIM #1] she was going to smack her multiple times. She also stated she was looking around hoping someone would be able to help shortly after that Officers arrived on scene.
Mariolina was placed in transport to the Cherokee County ADC and passed off to jail staff without incident; she was booked in on simple assault, criminal trespass, and obstruction.
[End of Narrative]
The information below reflects all details available at the time of publication and was obtained directly from the official court database accessible to the public. Court records are subject to change at any time at the court’s discretion. The Georgia Gazette is not responsible for errors, omissions, or discrepancies within the docket. No information provided should be construed as legal advice or opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
CASE HISTORY:
1/16/26
EXAMINATION AND BOND ORDER
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau appeared before a Cherokee County magistrate for her initial court hearing following her December 31, 2025, arrest on charges of disorderly conduct, obstruction of an officer, criminal trespassing, and simple assault. The court conducted an examination of the charges and set conditions for her release from custody, including any bond amount and requirements she must follow while her case is pending.
1/20/26
MOTION TO INVOKE RULE PRIOR TO VOIR DIRE
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau’s defense attorney filed a motion requesting that witnesses be excluded from the courtroom during jury selection and trial testimony. This prevents witnesses from hearing each other’s testimony, which could influence what they say when it’s their turn to testify in Cherokee County case 26UA0072.
1/20/26
MOTION TO REQUIRE THE STATE TO REVEAL ANY AGREEMENT ENTERED
What this means: Prezeau’s defense team is asking the prosecution to disclose any plea deals or agreements they have made with witnesses who might testify against her. This ensures the defense knows if any witness received benefits in exchange for their testimony in this Cherokee County case involving charges of disorderly conduct, obstruction, trespassing, and assault.
1/20/26
PRELIMINARY MOTION TO SUPPRESS
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau’s attorney filed a motion asking the court to exclude certain evidence from trial, arguing it was obtained illegally or improperly. Without seeing the specific grounds, this could relate to statements Prezeau allegedly made, physical evidence collected, or how the arrest was conducted in Cherokee County.
1/20/26
MOTION FOR CRIMINAL RECORD
What this means: The defense is requesting access to criminal records, likely of witnesses or others involved in the case. This helps Prezeau’s attorney prepare for cross-examination and understand the background of people who may testify about the alleged disorderly conduct, obstruction, trespassing, and assault incidents.
1/20/26
MOTION TO SUPPRESS
What this means: This appears to be another suppression motion filed by Mariolina Prezeau’s defense attorney in Cherokee County case 26UA0072. Defense attorneys often file multiple suppression motions targeting different types of evidence – for example, one for statements and another for physical evidence collected during the arrest.
1/20/26
MOTION AND BRIEF
What this means: Prezeau’s defense attorney filed a motion along with a detailed legal brief explaining their arguments. The brief provides the legal reasoning and case citations supporting whatever relief the defense is seeking from the Cherokee County court in this case involving multiple misdemeanor charges.
1/20/26
MOTION TO RECORD
What this means: The defense is asking the court to ensure all proceedings in Mariolina Prezeau’s case are properly recorded. This creates an official record for any potential appeals and ensures there’s a transcript of all testimony and arguments in Cherokee County case 26UA0072.
1/20/26
MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
What this means: Prezeau’s attorney is requesting that the prosecution turn over information related to her case. This is part of the discovery process where both sides share evidence and information before trial, helping ensure a fair proceeding in Cherokee County court.
1/20/26
MOTION TO REQUIRE THE STATE TO REVEAL
What this means: This appears to be another discovery motion where Mariolina Prezeau’s defense attorney is asking the prosecution to disclose specific information about the case. Defense attorneys typically file multiple disclosure requests to ensure they receive all evidence and information they’re entitled to see before trial.
1/20/26
MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE
What this means: Another discovery request filed by Prezeau’s defense team in Cherokee County case 26UA0072. The defense is working to obtain all available information about the charges against Mariolina Prezeau, including police reports, witness statements, and any other evidence the prosecution plans to use at trial.
1/20/26
PRELIMINARY MOTION TO SUPPRESS
What this means: This appears to be an additional suppression motion filed by Mariolina Prezeau’s attorney. Defense teams often file multiple suppression motions targeting different aspects of the case – this one may focus on different evidence or legal arguments than the earlier suppression motion filed the same day in Cherokee County.
1/20/26
MOTION FOR CRIMINAL RECORDS
What this means: Prezeau’s defense attorney is requesting access to criminal history records, possibly of witnesses or other individuals connected to the case. This information helps the defense prepare for trial and potential cross-examination in this Cherokee County case involving charges of disorderly conduct, obstruction, trespassing, and assault.
1/20/26
MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
What this means: The defense is asking the court to order that all evidence in Mariolina Prezeau’s case be preserved and not destroyed. This includes physical evidence, video recordings, police body camera footage, and any other materials that might be relevant to defending against the charges in Cherokee County case 26UA0072.
1/20/26
MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE OF INDEPENDENT AND SEPARATE OFFENSES, WRONGS, OR ACTS
What this means: Prezeau’s attorney is requesting that prosecutors reveal if they plan to introduce evidence of any other alleged bad acts or crimes beyond the current charges of disorderly conduct, obstruction, trespassing, and assault. Courts sometimes allow evidence of other incidents to show pattern or intent, but the defense has a right to know about this in advance.
1/20/26
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND
What this means: The defense is invoking a landmark Supreme Court case that requires prosecutors to turn over any evidence that might help prove Mariolina Prezeau’s innocence or undermine the prosecution’s case. This includes evidence that could impeach prosecution witnesses or cast doubt on the charges in Cherokee County case 26UA0072.
1/20/26
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERABLE MATERIAL
What this means: Prezeau’s defense attorney is formally requesting that the prosecution provide all evidence and materials they must share under discovery rules. This ensures the defense receives police reports, witness statements, physical evidence, and other materials related to the alleged incidents involving disorderly conduct, obstruction, trespassing, and assault.
1/20/26
CONSOLIDATED MOTIONS
What this means: This filing likely combines or organizes the various motions Mariolina Prezeau’s attorney filed on the same day in Cherokee County case 26UA0072. Courts sometimes ask attorneys to consolidate multiple related motions to streamline the hearing process and avoid repetitive arguments.
3/10/26
ACCUSATION FILED – SIMPLE ASSAULT, OBSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICER, AND CRIMINAL TRESPASS
What this means: The Cherokee County District Attorney’s office formally filed an accusation against Mariolina Prezeau, charging her with simple assault, obstruction of an officer, and criminal trespass. This document officially outlines the specific charges the state is bringing against Prezeau in case 26UA0072, moving the case from the initial arrest stage to formal prosecution.
4/21/26
STATE COURT ARRAIGNMENT CALENDAR SCHEDULED
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau is scheduled to appear in Cherokee County State Court at 9:30 AM for her arraignment. During this hearing, Prezeau will be formally read the charges against her and asked to enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest to the accusations of simple assault, obstruction of an officer, and criminal trespass.
6/17/26
STATUS HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 9:30AM
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau is scheduled to appear in Cherokee County court at 9:30 AM for a status hearing in case 26M0422. During this hearing, the court will review the progress of her case involving charges of simple assault, obstruction of an officer, and criminal trespass. The judge and attorneys will discuss any outstanding motions, discovery issues, or scheduling matters, and may set future court dates or discuss potential plea negotiations.
All information is sourced directly from the official, public court database. Case history is organized and curated by The Georgia Gazette staff. The “What this means:” explanations are written by AI and reviewed by our staff before publishing.
Court records are subject to change at the court’s discretion. The Georgia Gazette is not responsible for errors or omissions. Nothing here is legal advice. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Case History:
1/7/26
WAIVER OF APPOINTED ATTORNEY
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau waived her right to have an attorney appointed to her at public expense. This means she chose not to accept a court-appointed lawyer and indicated she would handle her case differently — either by hiring a private attorney or representing herself.
1/20/26
ATTORNEY APPOINTED AND ENTERS APPEARANCE
What this means: Ivrol Hines was appointed as Mariolina Prezeau’s attorney and filed a notice of appearance in the case. This means the court assigned Hines to represent the defendant, and Hines formally notified the court that she is now the defendant’s lawyer of record.
1/20/26
MULTIPLE PRETRIAL MOTIONS FILED
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau’s attorney, Ivrol Hines, filed numerous pretrial motions on behalf of the defendant, including motions to suppress evidence, motions for discovery and disclosure of evidence, a motion to invoke a procedural rule prior to jury selection, a motion to preserve evidence, a motion for the defendant’s criminal records, a motion to record proceedings, a motion requiring the state to reveal any agreements, and a motion reserving the right to file additional motions. These motions are standard pretrial requests seeking to challenge evidence, obtain information from the prosecution, and preserve the defendant’s rights before trial.
3/10/26
ACCUSATION FILED — 3 COUNTS AGAINST MARIOLINA PREZEAU
What this means: The state filed a formal accusation charging Mariolina Prezeau with three misdemeanor counts: Simple Assault, Obstruction of an Officer, and Criminal Trespass (Physical Trespass). An accusation is the charging document used in magistrate court and formally notifies the defendant of the charges she is facing.
3/30/26
WAIVER OF ARRAIGNMENT
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau waived her right to an arraignment hearing. An arraignment is where a defendant is formally told of the charges and asked to enter a plea. By waiving this hearing, the defendant agreed to proceed without this formal step.
4/30/26
PLEA ENTERED AND SENTENCE IMPOSED
What this means: Mariolina Prezeau entered a plea and received a sentence on the three counts. On Count 1 (Simple Assault), the charge was nolle prossed — meaning the state declined to prosecute and the charge was dismissed. On Count 2 (Obstruction of an Officer), the defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere (no contest) and received a suspended sentence of 12 months, meaning she will not serve jail time unless she violates the terms of her probation. On Count 3 (Criminal Trespass), the defendant also entered a plea of nolo contendere and received a suspended sentence of 12 months under the same conditions.