You're not signed in. Sign in to remove ads.

Sign in
Dark
Light
April 9, 2026
March 4, 2026

Joseph Moseley

Follow This Case

Get notified by email when this case is updated.

1 following this case

Name:
Moseley, Joseph Saiah

Date of Booking:
02/24/2026

Reason(s) For Booking:
HIT AND RUN; DUTY OF DRIVER TO STOP AT O

Officer’s Narrative:
[Please note: The following is a direct transcription from the official initial incident report. The Georgia Gazette does not fix any spelling or grammatical errors that may exist. Any changes or redactions made by our staff are placed inside brackets. Some errors may exist. All subjects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The topics discussed may be sensitive to some readers. Discretion is advised.]

On January 5th 2026, at approximately 1930 hours, I responded to a call regarding a motor vehicle accident at [SINGLE DIGIT BLOCK] Creekview Drive and Roscoe Road.

Upon arrival, I met with the caller Mr. [VICTIM #1], who stated he had been in contact with a young black male on Facebook Marketplace, by the name of Isaiah Moseley who stated he would like to purchase his 202 Honda CRF 250 Type R dirt bike for $5000.00.

The two had agreed to meet at Mr. [VICTIM #1]’s address of [100 BLOCK] Creekview Drive. When Mr. Moseley arrived, Mr. [VICTIM #1] thought it was odd that Mr. Moseley didn’t know how to ride a motorcycle and was having someone come pick it up on a trailer.

Mr. Moseley requested a test drive which Mr. [VICTIM #1] obliged provided that Mr. Moseley provided some type of collateral during the test drive. Mr. Moseley provided a Delta Credit Union Credit Card with the name Joseph Moseley on it.

Upon entering the roadway Mr. Moseley quickly accelerated down the Creekview Dr. unable to change gears. When Mr. [VICTIM #1] realized this was an issue he immediately took off after him in his father’s truck. As he arrived at the intersection of Creekview and Roscoe he saw the motorcycle on the side of the road and Mr. Moseley was limping off to a Silver Honda Accord that was already on scene.

As I was taking the report, Mr. [VICTIM #1] remarked that there was an odd coincidence between the story he received from Mr. Moseley and a Mr. [WITNESS #1] subject who had attempted to buy the vehicle the day prior.

When asked to elaborate on that, Mr. [VICTIM #1] stated that Mr. [WITNESS #1] had given a similar story about coming by to get the Motorcycle and would also have another person pick it up in a trailer, but after feeling suspicious about the transaction, Mr. [VICTIM #1] cancelled the transaction. Mr. [VICTIM #1] also found it odd that Mr. Moseley’s facebook page was created recently, with only two friends, and suggested that the facebook page was only created to make the encounter for the motorcycle.

During this interview, an EMS call came out at [40 BLOCK] Berry Avenue, regarding a broken leg due to a motorcycle accident. After an RMS search of the name Joseph Moseley, I discovered that his address came back to [40 BLOCK] Berry Avenue. I generated a case number for Mr. [VICTIM #1] and advised him to contact the Sheriff’s Office with any further information about the case.

I then responded to [40 BLOCK] Berry Avenue, where Mr. Moseley was loaded into an ambulance and transported to Grady Memorial. Outside the residence, there was a Silver Honda Accord with the Tag No: [REDACTED].

Outside the vehicle deputies were already speaking to a Mr. [WITNESS #1] subject who initially stated he had no idea who the occupant he transported from the scene of the crash was and he was coming down Roscoe Rd. and was flagged down for help. Mr. [WITNESS #1], then changed his story stating Mr. Moseley was his cousin, but he had no idea what was happening and had no affiliation with the transaction that was occurring.

Mr. [WITNESS #1] was then asked if he had even been in contact with Mr. [VICTIM #1] regarding the motorcycle and he said he had not. After telling him I was aware than he had attempted to purchase the motorcycle two days prior, he changed his story and stated he had been in contact but was unaware than Mr. Moseley was trying to purchase it.

Mr. [WITNESS #1] then stated he was aware he was trying to purchase the vehicle, but didn’t drop him off there. Mr. [WITNESS #1] then stated that he had dropped Mr. Moseley off there but then left to go to Sprayberry road.

When asked how he was able to drop Mr. Moseley off and get to Sprayberry Rd. and get back in time to be on the scene of the crash only a few minutes later, Mr. [WITNESS #1] changed his story and stated he had left to go to Sprayberry road, but never got there. He saw the accident occur and turned around.

At the end of questioning, Mr. [WITNESS #1] was released due to lack of sufficient evidence to show compliance with leaving the scene of a hit and run accident. However, due to the totality and convenience of Mr. [WITNESS #1] presence during the incident, and various inconsistencies during questioning, I believe through my knowledge, training and experience, there is a high probability there was a conspiration between, Mr. [WITNESS #1] and Mr. Moseley to commit a theft of the motorcycle in question. For that reason, Mr. Moseley’s phone was taken from his mother and is being placed into evidence pending further investigation.

Warrants are being obtained for Mr. Moseley for leaving the scene of an accident as well as a search warrant for the contents of his phone regarding the dialogue between Mr. [WITNESS #1] and Mr. Moseley.

[End of Narrative]

Follow This Case

Get notified by email when this case is updated.

1 following this case