Get notified by email when this case is updated.
The Georgia Gazette is actively monitoring this case. Check back for the latest updates as more information becomes available.
Name:
Plancarte, Abelino
Date of Booking:
06/30/2026
Reason(s) For Booking:
Unlawful conduct during 9-1-1 call
Officer’s Narrative:
[Please note: The following is a direct transcription from the official initial incident report. The Georgia Gazette does not fix any spelling or grammatical errors that may exist. Any changes or redactions made by our staff are placed inside brackets. Some errors may exist. All subjects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The topics discussed may be sensitive to some readers. Discretion is advised.]
On 06/30/2026 at approximately 0230 hrs, I, Deputy Murphy and Cpl Davis were dispatched to [100 BLOCK] Pioneer Trail for a Verbal Domestic.
Prior to arriving on scene dispatch advised deputies that Abelino was cursing at the call taker but did not state what he had said at that time. Deputies were told that Abelino was mad because he was unsatisfied with deputies’ response time.
Once on scene I made contact with Abelino Plancarte (W/F [REDACTED BY AGENCY]/2002), who at the time was in the garage with his girlfriend [WITNESS #1] (W/F [REDACTED BY AGENCY]/2002). They were sitting in a gray in color Toyota Camry that was backed into the garage. Before I was able to speak to either individual, Abelino told [WITNESS #1] not to speak and to go inside of the residence in which she did. As I attempted to speak to Abelino he went on a rant about deputies being at the residence uninvited, however he was the individual found to have called 911 and was on the phone with dispatch as we arrived on scene.
As I was on scene there was a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from Abelino, he could not stand straight up at times and could not provide me simple information. He was asked multiple times by deputies to explain what had occurred, but he did not. He only advised deputies we were unwanted at the residence and began yelling and cursing as he recorded with his phone.
As I continued attempting to get information from Abelino, deputies made contact with [WITNESS #1] separately at the front door of the residence.
[WITNESS #1] advised deputies that she had a simple disagreement with Abelino because he was very intoxicated and he could not understand what she was trying to explain to him. She stated to deputies that nothing was physical and was even willing to provide deputies with proof of no bruising on her body at that time. [WITNESS #1] told deputies that Abelino had called 911 due to the unknown disagreement.
Once it was determined that no one was hurt and no crime had been committed deputies explained furthermore the reason, we were at the residence. But Abelino was so intoxicated it is unclear if he understood what deputies were saying.
As deputies were departing the scene in their patrol vehicles, Abelino waved for deputies’ attention and contact with him was made again.
Abelino began to tell deputies that once we left, he began to receive harassing phone calls; however, deputies were just speaking with him approximately 2 minutes ago. While on scene Abelino began pacing back and forth in the front yard of the residence while yelling and cursing at deputies. At that time [WITNESS #1] made attempts to escort Abelino inside of the residence, but he did not go inside only continued to curse at deputies because he felt as if we were trespassing and harassing him.
Deputies then departed the scene again and [WITNESS #1] was advised to contact the Houston County Sheriffs Office if anything further happens.
Approximately 10 minutes later, deputies were dispatched back to the residence because Abelino had called stating that he was harassed.
While enroute deputies were advised of the active phone call that was taking place with Abelino. Dispatched advised deputies that Abelino was cursing at them stating that they were b*tch a*s n*ggas and that deputies could f*ck off. Once deputies arrived on scene, we were still receiving information that Abelino was on the phone with dispatch ranting and cursing at the dispatch call taker.
Contact with Abelino was made again and he was asked to provide Sgt Archie with information in regard to being harassed by previous once deputies. While speaking to Sgt Archie he accused previous on scene deputies of violating his rights, unlawfully being on the property and accusing him of doing something unlawful. At that time Abelino was still showing signs of being highly intoxicated.
Abelino was then arrested for Unlawful Conduct During a 911 Call (O.C.G.A. 16-11-39.2) transported and released to the Houston County Detention Center.
I will obtain a warrant on Abelino on the next available date.
A CD will be attached to this incident as evidence from the phone call taken from the dispatch center.
[End of Narrative]
All information is sourced directly from the official, public court database. Case history is organized and curated by The Georgia Gazette staff. The “What this means:” explanations are written by AI and reviewed by our staff before publishing.
Court records are subject to change at the court’s discretion. The Georgia Gazette is not responsible for errors or omissions. Nothing here is legal advice. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Case History:
6/30/26
CASH BOND SET — ABELINO PLANCARTE RELEASED ON $580 BOND
What this means: A cash bond of $580 was posted with the Houston County Sheriff’s Office to secure Abelino Plancarte’s release from custody. The bond document, attested by Deputy Sheriff Althea Jackson and prepared by Deputy Sheriff Suzette Walker, requires Plancarte to personally appear before Houston County State Court beginning September 17, 2026, at 8:00 AM, and at all future required court dates. If Plancarte fails to appear, the bond money would be forfeited to the court. Plancarte also authorized Houston County to deduct any court fines and costs from the bond amount if applicable.
9/9/26
DEFENSE ATTORNEY ENTERS APPEARANCE — ABELINO PLANCARTE-AGUIRRE PLEADS NOT GUILTY, WAIVES FORMAL ARRAIGNMENT
What this means: Attorney Maggie Sumrall Dixon of The Sumrall Firm, LLC formally entered the case as defense counsel for Abelino Plancarte-Aguirre on September 9, 2026, in the Houston County State Court. Along with entering her appearance, Dixon filed a waiver of formal arraignment on Plancarte-Aguirre’s behalf — meaning the defendant chose to skip the in-person arraignment hearing that had been scheduled for September 17, 2026, and instead entered a plea of Not Guilty in writing. Plancarte-Aguirre is presumed innocent and explicitly reserved the right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment. The filing was accepted by Clerk of Courts Teresa Hathaway and is assigned to Judge Jason Ashford under case number 2026CR0118002.
9/9/26
DEFENSE FILES DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY IN MISDEMEANOR CASES
What this means: Also on September 9, 2026, attorney Maggie Sumrall Dixon filed a formal discovery demand on behalf of Abelino Plancarte-Aguirre in the Houston County State Court. Discovery is the legal process by which the defense requests access to evidence the prosecution intends to use. Under this filing, the defense is requesting the accusation or indictment and witness list, any statements Plancarte-Aguirre made while in police custody, any written scientific reports the State plans to use at trial, and all audio and video recordings related to the defendant before and after arrest. The demand was served on Solicitor-General Ryan W. English of the Houston County Solicitor-General’s Office and accepted by the court at 12:08 PM.
9/9/26
DEFENSE FILES SEPARATE DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND
What this means: A second, separate discovery demand was also filed by attorney Maggie Sumrall Dixon on September 9, 2026, this one specifically invoking Brady v. Maryland — a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that requires prosecutors to turn over any evidence that could help the defendant’s case. In this filing, the defense is demanding that Solicitor-General Ryan W. English produce any witness statements favorable to Abelino Plancarte-Aguirre, written reports or physical evidence that could support the defense, audio and video recordings from around the time of arrest, booking records and intake forms, dispatch logs, and any other evidence in the State’s possession that could benefit the defendant. The defense argues that without this evidence being produced before trial, Plancarte-Aguirre would be denied due process. The filing was accepted by the court at 12:08 PM under case number 2026CR0118002.