Flor Campos-Robles

Name:
Campos-Robles, Flor

Date of Booking:
01/18/2026

Reason(s) For Booking:
AGGRAVATED BATTERY

RECKLESS CONDUCT

Officer’s Narrative:
[Please note: The following is a direct transcription from the official initial incident report. The Georgia Gazette does not fix any spelling or grammatical errors that may exist. Any changes or redactions made by our staff are placed inside brackets. Some errors may exist. All subjects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The topics discussed may be sensitive to some readers. Discretion is advised.]

On January 18, 2026, I responded to 1911 Epps Bridge Pkwy (Walmsrt) for a report of an assault. Per the caller, they advised that a customer was being disorderly, and an employee pepper sprayed the customer.

When I arrived I met with the victim, but he was being treated for his injuries with EMTs. I was then shown where the employee that sprayed the victim was waiting, and I followed up with her.

The employee, Flor Campos Robles, advised me the following: the customer already had a disagreement with another employee over the price of merchandise. She offered help, but was told it was not needed at the time. The customer then went to the self-checkout with some alcoholic beverages. The register prompted for an employee to verify his age to purchase the alcoholic beverages. She asked the customer for his identification, but the customer refused and stated that she could scan her employee badge and allow him to complete his purchase. She insisted that she needs to see a form of identification so he could complete the purchase, but he continued to refuse and walked out of the store after she asked him to get out. He left the shopping cart with all the unpaid merchandise at the register.

The employees then moved the cart away from the registers, assuming he was not going to return to make the purchase. The customer then returned and began asking where all his stuff was. She tried to explain that it was brought to customer service so the items could be placed back on the shelves since they assumed he wasn’t returning. The customer then pulled out a phone and began taking pictures of her, and she asked him to stop. He kept asking for his merchandise, and she kept repeating that she did not move them from the register. He then pulled out his phone again to resume recording her and she pepper sprayed him.

Flor admitted that the customer did not make any threats of violence nor did he make any overt movements that she perceived as an imminent attack from the customer.

I then followed up with the victim. He was still flushing his eyes out with water. I was advised that he was struggling to remove one of his contact lenses. I asked the victim to explain what had occurred, and he advised me the following: he picked out some merchandise because of the cost. He then had a discussion with an employee over the misrepresentation of the cost of the merchandise. The victim deemed it necessary to explain that the Federal Trade Commission states that merchandise must be sold at the price that it is displayed as so stores can honor what they put out. He then got some help from another employee over his concerns and went to pay for his items. He only had his debit card on his person at this time.

The victim proceeded to explain in detail that when he was prompted to show identification for the purchase of alcoholic beverages he is not required to do so unless he were buying a keg. Based on his experience in the past, employees can mark that the customer is over 40 and the purchase can be completed. He then expressed that he had been over 40 for some time. He stated “this particular employee was feeling her oats,” referring to Flor, when Flor insisted on being provided an identification. He had asked Flor for her name and she refused to give it to him. He then started describing Flor as a heavyset lady approximately 25 years old.

Flor then told him to ‘get the f*ck out.” He then walked out of the store to get his bag that contained his wallet and then returned. He asked what happened to his merchandise and was told by another employee that they did not know, and they did not care. Flor then walked past him, and he took some photos so he could later reach out to Walmart about Flor and their Federal Trade Commission problem. He further explained he would address the issue about asking for a birth date to Walmart because “you can’t guarantee, nobody is not gonna ever, uh, hack into their system.”

He then put his phone up to take the pictures and that is when Flor sprayed him in the eyes with pepper spray. He then stated that no one ever asked him to leave the store. The victim confirmed that he wanted to pursue charges against Flor. The victim explained that when he was sprayed he was unable to see, and he still felt a burning sensation in his eyes and his face.

When I asked the victim for his information for the report, the victim refused to give me his identification and insisted that he would just tell me his name and date of birth. Once I collected his information, the victim advised me that he does not consent to having his information run through GCIC. I explained to him that in order to list him as a victim and continue with the charges his information will be run through GCIC. He stated he knows his information will be run, but he felt the need to tell me he does not consent.

I then reviewed security footage and I saw the following: the victim pulls up a phone and Flor sprays him. There is no overt action that could be deciphered as an assault from the victim.

I was then advised that another employee wanted to be listed as a victim because she got residual spray on her face. I followed up with the second victim, and she advised me that she was standing behind the customer and when Flor deployed the pepper spray she got some on her face. She explained she still felt a burning sensation on her face and eyes. At no point did she feel temporarily blinded from the spray.

I returned to Flor and I arrested her (handcuffed, checked for fit, double locked) for aggravated battery and reckless conduct. Flor consented to being escorted to her car to retrieve her wallet and the pepper spray that she had used. I then escorted her to the back of my patrol vehicle and transported her to county jail. I subsequently turned her over to a jail officer with no incident.

Warrants for aggravated battery and reckless conduct have been applied for and await approval from a judge. The pepper spray was later submitted into evidence. A notice of prohibited entry was given to the first victim as the manager requested he not return to their store. All forms were submitted for further processing. I was unable to obtain a copy of the security footage as the store did not have a form of storage available.

[End of Narrative]